Propelled by the growth of Facebook Inc. and LinkedIn Corp., social networks are now more popular than e-mailing on the Internet. Nielsen said social networking “member communities” are attracting 67 percent of Internet users while e-mail is at 65 percent. The study found that of Internet users throughout the world, two-thirds visited a social networking site last year. Of those, Palo Alto, Calif.-based
Facebook is the leader, with visits every month by three of every 10 Internet users, the Nielsen study reported. In fact, Facebook had a 168 percent increase in users, the study said, while Mountain View-based LinkedIn had a 137 percent increase. The biggest growth spurt for Facebook has been in the category of users from 35 to 49 years old.
Facebook has had its fifth birthday. There are more middle age people using social networks, alot on Bebo but I think more as their kids are, I personally think Bebo is for the younger ones, more middle age people are migrating to Facebook, i think you will find its because the UI is far more appealing and grown up. Maybe you didn’t get it in your news feed, but it was in February 2004 that Harvard student Mark Zuckerberg, along with some classmates, launched the social network that ate the world. Did he realize back then in his dorm that he was witnessing merely the larval stage of his
creation? For what began with college students has found its fullest, richest expression with us, the middle-aged. Facebook started as a website connecting students, enabling them to keep in touch and chat. However, as a student, the appeal of using this website for what it was originally designed for, has worn off, is it officially ‘uncool’ to have Facebook?? “My friends and I refuse to go on Facebook, as our mums and dads check up on what we’re up to and my privacy is beginning to suffer. With Facebook nothing in life is kept private, from relationship status to favourite book.” Are middle aged people simply jumping on the bandwagon?
I understand that they want to keep up with photos of their families and friends, but is Facebook the only way? Facebook could have lost the plot; it was designed for students communicating. It should be used to arrange a drink with friends but has turned into a stalker’s
heaven. And now with new applications being added weekly, like Botox trying to look younger, it has lost its simplicity, which is what I loved about it. How annoying does it become when everyone and their dog is taking a quiz or playing an application and challenging you, its just much, I don’t really care what people are doing!!!
Filed under: MidLife Crisis, What do middle age people need to tick? | Tagged: facebook, male, man, middle age, midlife, network, older, relationship, social, Women | Leave a Comment »
through the morning. Some studies have also shown that eating breakfast (high carbohydrate/low fat) can make you more alert and assertive to face the day. Overcome the reasons not to have breakfast and make it part of your day. If you’re too busy in the morning, prepare as much as you can the night before. If you can’t stomach anything first thing try just a glass of pure, unsweetened fruit juice, a banana, yoghurt or slice of toast. Get into the habit of trying different dishes at breakfast and enjoy it!
calories (75kcals each if boiled / poached) and contain very little saturated fat. Use wholemeal bread for the “soldiers” and resist the butter / spread – try marmite instead! Accompany with a glass of fruit or vegetable juice. Traditional English, you don’t have to miss out on your traditional Sunday breakfast. There’s nothing wrong with a cooked breakfast as long as it’s a “grill up”, not a “fry up” – fried foods hold the fat! Lean bacon is a good source of protein, trim the fat and grill. Eggs contain iron and calcium – to get the benefits poach or boil. Add some low-sugar, low-salt baked beans and a grilled tomato.
Accompany with some toasted wholemeal bread and a glass of unsweetened fruit juice. Let your breakfast digest and then enjoy a Sunday morning walk (depending on your weight you’ll burn between 90-190kcals walking moderately for 30 minutes).
Its not bad enough that anyone knows apart from me, its still simple to naturally pull it in and lift it up without anyone else noticing. This is all about getting into good habits, the older you get you do need to be more aware of changing aspects of your body and the everyday habits that you collect over the years and that routine you get in to.
Your body will lose fat evenly, over time. The good news is you don’t have to change the whole world. For maximum weight loss to occur you only need consistency, to do the same things over and over again. These simple weight loss tips will get you started and help you consistently lose more and more stomach fat, as long as you stick with them. So lets go, im taking some pictures of the before and after …. that should be quite entertaining.
It had previously been suggested keeping your calorie intake to a minimum had to begin earlier to have an impact. 

This is not to say particular products aren’t effective as they may prevent you from adding additional pounds or even help you lose a few pounds. Also is the issue of carbs, we are not idiots here, we realize carbohydrates are used for energy. However, the bottom line is most people consume much more carbohydrates then they need on a daily basis and the excess gets converted to fat. You know the story.
problem, in my opinion, is that time management is like an inkblot: What is defined as an effective technique by one person may be deemed totally useless by another. As the training session continued we concluded that no magic bullet exists. No single technique works for everybody. But I did point out that for all its hype in the 80s and 90s, multitasking has proven to be highly overrated. In fact, it’s been proven that bouncing back and forth between tasks actually lowers effectiveness and productivity. I first became aware of this through a conversation with Robert Croker, Ed.D., chair of the Human Resource Training and Development department at Idaho State University. Croker, who is certified in brain-based learning, says that the brain is not designed for multitasking. “It’s a common misconception is that a brain is like a computer,” Croker says. “A computer is designed to multitask. A human brain is not designed to function optimally in a multitask environment.” The myths of multitasking are further discussed in the Journal of Experimental Psychology and in the science journal NeuroImage. Research appearing in these publications has found that each time a person switches back and forth between tasks, the brain goes through several time-consuming activities, including: * a selection process for choosing a new activity, * turning off the mental rules needed to do the first task, * turning on the mental rules needed to do the second task, * orienting itself to the conditions currently surrounding the new task Research indicates that jumping back and forth between tasks can take four times longer to accomplish them—simply due to the time required for switching gears. Furthermore, research shows that the quality of completed tasks becomes severely diminished when trying to do two tasks simultaneously. Just think of how effective you are at making driving decisions while you’re talking on your mobile phone and you’ll know what they mean. It’s turning out that maximum productivity is more likely to be a result of better planning. One of my favorite time management tips often causes people to shudder, but it creates an excellent environment for better planning. The tip comes from workplace-organizer guru Julie Morgenstern, and it’s simply this: Never check e-mail first thing in the morning. Before you write off this technique as hare-brained, consider the results discovered by one group of managers who squawked pretty loudly when I first suggested this to them. After writing off the idea as “not possible,” the powers of the heavens must have snickered when the group’s e-mail server went down the following Monday. It wasn’t just the morning, checking and sending e-mail became “not possible” for an entire day. Met with these managers later that week the team’s leader proclaimed, “We got so much work done this past Monday— I think we should make every Monday to be ‘no e-mail day.’” Those words would make Morgenstern proud. But it doesn’t have to be that extreme. The idea is to simply set aside time at the beginning of your day and evaluate the work before you. Then ask yourself: What will bring the biggest financial return for your efforts? If you could put only one thing on your to-do list and still be productive, what would that one thing be? Morgenstern recommends taking the time to get that profit-generating work done—and she means “done” as in task accomplished—before switching your mental gears to check e-mail. Think about it: When it comes to getting sidetracked, e-mail is a major culprit. The work that makes you money should come first. But even after completing your most important task, stopping to check e-mail five, eight, twelve times a day requires an awful lot of brain switching—a.k.a wasted time. With this knowledge, it’s easy to see why Morgenstern recommends establishing no more than four regular times that we check e-mail throughout the day. One highly effective workplace I know of established a policy to check e-mail only three times a day. At 11:00 a.m. so they can dedicate an hour to written correspondence before lunch; at 1:00 p.m. to reply to any follow-up responses; and again at 4:00 p.m. so they can make adjustments to their next day’s schedule. They tell clients and vendors up front of this policy so everyone knows what to expect. Interestingly, employees at this company that fudge on this policy and check e-mail throughout the day are not as productive—and can’t seem to figure out how the other people get so much more done. Bottom line, multitasking has been proven to make us less effective, not more. And although e-mail can be a huge time saver, it can also be a huge time-waster if we become its slave instead of its master.
6.2 inches long and 3.7 inches around, whereas the average black male has a penis 6.3 by 3.8 inches. When it came to flaccid length, however, blacks fared a little better: 4.3 inches long, versus 4.0 inches for white males.